This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1077801209333611v1 15/7/810    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Weiss, K. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Weiss, K. G. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

"Boys Will Be Boys" and Other Gendered Accounts: An Exploration of Victims’ Excuses and Justifications for Unwanted Sexual Contact and Coercion

West Virginia University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Karen.weiss{at}mail.wvu.edu.

	Abstract

An examination of 944 victim narratives from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) finds that one in five women who reveal an incident of sexual victimization to the NCVS excuse or justify their situations, largely by drawing on social vocabularies that suggest male sexual aggression is natural, normal within dating relationships, or the victim’s fault. The study’s findings substantiate the influence that rape myths and gender stereotypes have on victims’ perceptions of their own unwanted sexual situations and demonstrate the ways in which cultural language delimits victims’ recognition of sexual victimization as crime and inhibits reporting to the police.

First published on April 3, 2009, doi:10.1177/1077801209333611

Violence Against Women 2009;15:810.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?