This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1077801209331408v1 15/5/532    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Murray, S. Articles by Powell, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Murray, S. Articles by Powell, A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Domestic Violence Women's Health Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

"What's the Problem?": Australian Public Policy Constructions of Domestic and Family Violence

¹ RMIT University
² La Trobe University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: suellen.murray{at}rmit.edu.au.

	Abstract

The campaign of feminists to have domestic violence formally acknowledged as a key issue affecting Australian women succeeded in the early 1980s when governments began developing policy seeking to address the problem. Far from simply adopting feminist gendered understandings of domestic violence, however, the development of contemporary policy responses to this issue has been influenced by a number of competing discourses about the problem, its causes, and possible solutions. Drawing on Bacchi’s policy analysis approach, the authors compare the discursive constructions of domestic violence inherent in how the issue is named, framed, and defined across contemporary Australian policy documents.

First published on February 10, 2009, doi:10.1177/1077801209331408

Violence Against Women 2009;15:532.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?