|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Understanding the Context of Dual Arrest With Directions for Future Research
David Hirschel
Eve Buzawa
University of Massachusetts Lowell
Arrest rates for intimate partner violence have increased dramatically since the implementation of preferred and mandatory arrest policies. Of concern has been the increase in the percentage of cases in which both parties in an incident have been arrested. This article examines the current research on dual arrests and the deficiencies of that research, argues that dual arrest should not be examined in a vacuum but should be placed in a broader context taking into account both the full range of police options and comparisons of police action in intimate partner violence cases to the responses to other domestic and nondomestic incidents, and outlines an agenda for future research.
Violence Against Women, Vol. 8, No. 12,
1449-1473 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/107780102237965

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Muftic, L. A. Bouffard, and J. A. Bouffard
An Exploratory Analysis of Victim Precipitation Among Men and Women Arrested for Intimate Partner Violence
Feminist Criminology,
October 1, 2007;
2(4):
327 - 346.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Muftic, J. A. Bouffard, and L. A. Bouffard
An Exploratory Study of Women Arrested for Intimate Partner Violence: Violent Women or Violent Resistance?
J Interpers Violence,
June 1, 2007;
22(6):
753 - 774.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. Hughes, G. L. Stuart, K. Coop Gordon, and T. M. Moore
Predicting the use of aggressive conflict tactics in a sample of women arrested for domestic violence
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
April 1, 2007;
24(2):
155 - 176.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Muftic and J. A. Bouffard
An Evaluation of Gender Differences in the Implementation and Impact of a Comprehensive Approach to Domestic Violence
Violence Against Women,
January 1, 2007;
13(1):
46 - 69.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Swan and D. L. Snow
The Development of a Theory of Women's Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships
Violence Against Women,
November 1, 2006;
12(11):
1026 - 1045.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. DeLeon-Granados, W. Wells, and R. Binsbacher
Arresting Developments: Trends in Female Arrests for Domestic Violence and Proposed Explanations
Violence Against Women,
April 1, 2006;
12(4):
355 - 371.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Finn and P. Bettis
Punitive Action or Gentle Persuasion: Exploring Police Officers' Justifications for Using Dual Arrest in Domestic Violence Cases
Violence Against Women,
March 1, 2006;
12(3):
268 - 287.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Romkens
Protecting Prosecution: Exploring the Powers of Law in an Intervention Program for Domestic Violence
Violence Against Women,
February 1, 2006;
12(2):
160 - 186.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Miller and M. L. Meloy
Women's Use of Force: Voices of Women Arrested for Domestic Violence
Violence Against Women,
January 1, 2006;
12(1):
89 - 115.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. M. Parmley
Violence Against Women Research Post VAWA: Where Have We Been, Where Are We Going?
Violence Against Women,
December 1, 2004;
10(12):
1417 - 1430.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Raphael
Rethinking Criminal Justice Responses to Intimate Partner Violence
Violence Against Women,
November 1, 2004;
10(11):
1354 - 1366.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. McMahon and E. Pence
Making Social Change: Reflections on Individual and Institutional Advocacy With Women Arrested for Domestic Violence
Violence Against Women,
January 1, 2003;
9(1):
47 - 74.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Osthoff
But, Gertrude, I Beg to Differ, a Hit Is Not a Hit Is Not a Hit: When Battered Women Are Arrested for Assaulting Their Partners
Violence Against Women,
December 1, 2002;
8(12):
1521 - 1544.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|