Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Violence Against Women
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SEQUEIRA, H.
Right arrow Articles by HALSTEAD, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by SEQUEIRA, H.
Right arrow Articles by HALSTEAD, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"Is it Meant to Hurt, is it?"

Management of Violence in Women With Developmental Disabilities

HEATHER SEQUEIRA

St. Georges Hospital Medical School & St. Andrews Hospital

SIMON HALSTEAD

Ashley House: Care Principles

The use of seclusion, restraint, and rapid tranquilization for people with developmental disabilities is controversial. A statistical analysis of 3,767 such incidents, involving 82 clients with developmental disabilities, is presented along with semistructured interview material completed following personal experience of emergency intervention. Women were involved in a disproportionately high number of incidents. It was found that women had a significantly higher probability of being given rapid tranquilization following a violent incident. In contrast, seclusion was more likely to be used with men. Interviews with women demonstrated a commonly held understanding of interventions as punishment and expressions of intense anger and anxiety. The study highlights the importance of including the perspectives of people with developmental disabilities in care planning and staff training.

Violence Against Women, Vol. 7, No. 4, 462-476 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/10778010122182550


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
Y. Lunsky and C. Gracey
The reported experience of four women with intellectual disabilities receiving emergency psychiatric services in Canada: A qualitative study
J Intellect Disabil., June 1, 2009; 13(2): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
B. Paterson and J. Duxbury
Restraint and the Question of Validity
Nursing Ethics, July 1, 2007; 14(4): 535 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
R. Fish and E. Culshaw
The last resort?: Staff and client perspectives on physical intervention
J Intellect Disabil., June 1, 2005; 9(2): 93 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]