Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Violence Against Women
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AVAKAME, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by AVAKAME, E. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Females' Labor Force Participation and Rape

An Empirical Test of the Backlash Hypothesis

EDEM F. AVAKAME

Temple University

Ellis has observed that although feminist theorists clearly identify gender inequality as the fundamental cause of violence against women, they are vague about the direction of the causal effect. Using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (1992-1994) incident-level rape subset data file, this article tests the hypothesis that females' labor force participation will increase their rape victimization by frustrating resentful males into using violence as an ultimate resource in humiliation and control (i.e., the backlash hypothesis). Contrary to this proposition, results show that unemployed women are more likely to be raped than employed women. They also show that poor, older, unmarried, White, suburban females have disproportionate risks of rape victimization. Implications of these data for the debate on the uniqueness of violence against women are discussed.

Violence Against Women, Vol. 5, No. 8, 926-949 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/10778019922181554


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
L. M. Pazzani
The Factors Affecting Sexual Assaults Committed by Strangers and Acquaintances
Violence Against Women, July 1, 2007; 13(7): 717 - 749.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
K. Martin, L. M. Vieraitis, and S. Britto
Gender Equality and Women's Absolute Status: A Test of the Feminist Models of Rape
Violence Against Women, April 1, 2006; 12(4): 321 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
E. E. Mustaine and R. Tewksbury
Sexual Assault of College Women: A Feminist Interpretation of a Routine Activities Analysis
Criminal Justice Review, May 1, 2002; 27(1): 89 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]