This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by HAMBERGER, L. K. Articles by TOLIN, D. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by HAMBERGER, L. K. Articles by TOLIN, D. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Empirical Classification of Motivations for Domestic Violence

St. Catherine's Family Practice Center, Kenosha, WI

JEFFREY M. LOHR

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

DENNIS BONGE

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

DAVID F. TOLIN

Allegheny University for the Medical Sciences

National survey research suggests that males and females are equally likely to perpetrate domestic violence, but surveys have not examined the interpersonal context or motivation for domestic violence. The questioning of identified partner assaulters suggests that females use violence for self-defense and escape, whereas males use violence to exercise control, punish, or demand attention. The perception of perpetrator violence, however, appears also to be a function of the gender of the individual appraising the violence. Six male and 6 female adult nonperpetrators sorted into categories the stated motivations for domestic violence of 215 male and 66 female court-referred perpetrators. Factor analysis revealed (a) motivations common to all: control, anger expression, and coercive communication; (b) motivations specific to gender of perpetrator: retaliation, self-defense, escape, and punishment; and (c) motivations specific to gender of perpetrator and sorter: alcohol use and response to verbal abuse.

Violence Against Women, Vol. 3, No. 4, 401-423 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1077801297003004005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Gelaye, N. Lam, S. M. Cripe, S. E. Sanchez, and M. A. Williams Correlates of Violent Response Among Peruvian Women Abused by an Intimate Partner J Interpers Violence, January 1, 2010; 25(1): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. F. Chabot, T. L. Tracy, C. A. Manning, and C. A. Poisson Sex, Attribution, and Severity Influence Intervention Decisions of Informal Helpers in Domestic Violence J Interpers Violence, October 1, 2009; 24(10): 1696 - 1713. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. L. Hettrich and K. D. O'Leary Females' Reasons for Their Physical Aggression in Dating Relationships J Interpers Violence, September 1, 2007; 22(9): 1131 - 1143. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Swan and D. L. Snow The Development of a Theory of Women's Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships Violence Against Women, November 1, 2006; 12(11): 1026 - 1045. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Rajah Respecting Boundaries: The Symbolic and Material Concerns of Drug-Involved Women Employing Violence against Violent Male Partners Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2006; 46(5): 837 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. L. Stuart, T. M. Moore, J. C. Hellmuth, S. E. Ramsey, and C. W. Kahler Reasons for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Among Arrested Women Violence Against Women, July 1, 2006; 12(7): 609 - 621. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Miller and M. L. Meloy Women's Use of Force: Voices of Women Arrested for Domestic Violence Violence Against Women, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 89 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Langhinrichsen-Rohling Top 10 Greatest "Hits": Important Findings and Future Directions for Intimate Partner Violence Research J Interpers Violence, January 1, 2005; 20(1): 108 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Messing and J. W. Heeren Another Side of Multiple Murder: Women Killers in the Domestic Context Homicide Studies, May 1, 2004; 8(2): 123 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. P. Buttell and C. K. Pike Investigating the Differential Effectiveness of a Batterer Treatment Program on Outcomes for African American and Caucasian Batterers Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2003; 13(6): 675 - 692. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Graham-Kevan and J. Archer Intimate Terrorism and Common Couple Violence: A Test of Johnson's Predictions in Four British Samples J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2003; 18(11): 1247 - 1270. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. C. Melton and J. Belknap He Hits, She Hits: Assessing Gender Differences and Similarities in Officially Reported Intimate Partner Violence Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2003; 30(3): 328 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. G. Saunders Are Physical Assaults by Wives and Girlfriends a Major Social Problem?: A Review of the Literature Violence Against Women, December 1, 2002; 8(12): 1424 - 1448. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. K. Hamberger and C. E. Guse Men's and Women's Use of Intimate Partner Violence in Clinical Samples Violence Against Women, November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1301 - 1331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. D. Dasgupta A Framework for Understanding Women's Use of Nonlethal Violence in Intimate Heterosexual Relationships Violence Against Women, November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1364 - 1389. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. W. BARNETT Why Battered Women Do Not Leave, Part 1: External Inhibiting Factors Within Society Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2000; 1(4): 343 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. P. CRAMER Variables That Predict Verdicts in Domestic Violence Cases J Interpers Violence, November 1, 1999; 14(11): 1137 - 1150. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. P. DOBASH, R. E. DOBASH, K. CAVANAGH, and R. LEWIS Separate and Intersecting Realities: A Comparison of Men's and Women's Accounts of Violence Against Women Violence Against Women, August 1, 1998; 4(4): 382 - 414. [Abstract]