This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by RIGAKOS, G. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by RIGAKOS, G. S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Situational Determinants of Police Responses to Civil and Criminal Injunctions for Battered Women

York University

Informed by a feminist perspective, this article examines the enforcement practices of police officers when responding to breaches of civil restraining orders and Canadian Criminal Code peace bonds. Police officers for Delta, British Columbia, were administered a questionnaire (N = 45) focusing on their actions when presented with a restraining order by a survivor at a domestic call. Self-report data show that an arrest ensues in only 21% of the cases where there is a breach of a civil restraining order (N = 19), and 35% of the cases where a breached peace bond is presented (N= 29). Despite this, more officers report recommending women obtain a civil restraining order (62%) than a peace bond (53%). The police disclose that when they do arrest for breaches of protective court orders, there are signs of forced entry, a potentially violent offender, or signs of a struggle. A woman's plea that the police arrest is ranked sixth out of 12 situational variables inciting the police to enforce the order.

Violence Against Women, Vol. 3, No. 2, 204-216 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/1077801297003002006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Perez Trujillo and S. Ross Police Response to Domestic Violence: Making Decisions About Risk and Risk Management J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2008; 23(4): 454 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Postmus Challenging the Negative Assumptions Surrounding Civil Protection Orders: A Guide for Advocates Affilia, November 1, 2007; 22(4): 347 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Moe Silenced Voices and Structured Survival: Battered Women's Help Seeking Violence Against Women, July 1, 2007; 13(7): 676 - 699. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T K Logan, L. Shannon, and R. Walker Police Attitudes Toward Domestic Violence Offenders Journal of Interpersonal Violence J Interpers Violence, October 1, 2006; 21(10): 1365 - 1374. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Mendias and E. J. Kehoe Engagement of Policing Ideals and Their Relationship to the Exercise of Discretionary Powers Criminal Justice and Behavior, February 1, 2006; 33(1): 70 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Romkens Protecting Prosecution: Exploring the Powers of Law in an Intervention Program for Domestic Violence Violence Against Women, February 1, 2006; 12(2): 160 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Crocker Regulating Intimacy: Judicial Discourse in Cases of Wife Assault (1970 to 2000) Violence Against Women, February 1, 2005; 11(2): 197 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. E. Jordan Intimate Partner Violence and the Justice System: An Examination of the Interface J Interpers Violence, December 1, 2004; 19(12): 1412 - 1434. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Fleury Missing Voices: Patterns of Battered Women's Satisfaction With the Criminal Legal System Violence Against Women, February 1, 2002; 8(2): 181 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. KANE Police Responses to Restraining Orders in Domestic Violence Incidents: Identifying the Custody-Threshold Thesis Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2000; 27(5): 561 - 580. [Abstract] [PDF]