This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by CHENOWETH, L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by CHENOWETH, L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Violence and Women With Disabilities

Silence and Paradox

Griffith University

Women with disabilities typically occupy positions of extreme marginalization and exclusion that make them more vulnerable to violence and abuse than other women. There is a profound silence around the lived experiences of many women with disabilities that has meant that the violence in their lives is largely invisible and unknown. Further, many of our social practices involving women with disabilities appear to be based on contradictory assumptions that give rise to a series of paradoxes. Practices such as overprotection, segregation, the training of women with disabilities to comply with requests from staff, and a prevailing view that women with disabilities are simultaneously asexual and promiscuous all increase the incidence of abuse and violence rather than prevent it. This article examines experiences of a number of Australian women with disabilities, their mothers and other women who work with them, and official reports of several Australian inquiries into violence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. F. GILSON, E. DePOY, and E. P. CRAMER Linking the Assessment of Self-Reported Functional Capacity With Abuse Experiences of Women With Disabilities Violence Against Women, April 1, 2001; 7(4): 418 - 431. [Abstract] [PDF]