Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Violence Against Women
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Family Issues
*Women's Health
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conflict and Control

Gender Symmetry and Asymmetry in Domestic Violence

Michael P. Johnson

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Four types of individual partner violence are identified based on the dyadic control context of the violence. In intimate terrorism, the individual is violent and controlling, the partner is not. In violent resistance, the individual is violent but not controlling; the partner is the violent and controlling one. In situational couple violence, although the individual is violent, neither the individual nor the partner is violent and controlling. In mutual violent control, the individual and the partner are violent and controlling. Evidence is presented that situational couple violence dominates in general surveys, intimate terrorism and violent resistance dominate in agency samples, and this is the source of differences across studies with respect to the gender symmetry of partner violence. An argument is made that if we want to understand partner violence, intervene effectively in individual cases, or make useful policy recommendations, we must make these distinctions in our research.

Key Words: gender symmetry • intimate terrorism • mutual violent control • situational couple violence • violent resistance

Violence Against Women, Vol. 12, No. 11, 1003-1018 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077801206293328


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
K. L. Anderson
Gendering Coercive Control
Violence Against Women, December 1, 2009; 15(12): 1444 - 1457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
C. T. Allen, S. C. Swan, and C. Raghavan
Gender Symmetry, Sexism, and Intimate Partner Violence
J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2009; 24(11): 1816 - 1834.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
A. Paranjape, G. Corbie-Smith, N. Thompson, and N. J. Kaslow
When Older African American Women Are Affected by Violence in the Home: A Qualitative Investigation of Risk and Protective Factors
Violence Against Women, August 1, 2009; 15(8): 977 - 990.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
K. A. Tyler, L. A. Melander, and H. Noel
Bidirectional Partner Violence Among Homeless Young Adults: Risk Factors and Outcomes
J Interpers Violence, June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1014 - 1035.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
C. B. Cunradi, M. Bersamin, and G. Ames
Agreement on Intimate Partner Violence Among a Sample of Blue-Collar Couples
J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2009; 24(4): 551 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. S. Menard, A. L. Anderson, and S. M. Godboldt
Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Recidivism: A 5-Year Follow-Up
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 36(1): 61 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
A. M. Teitelman, S. J. Ratcliffe, M. M. Morales-Aleman, and C. M. Sullivan
Sexual Relationship Power, Intimate Partner Violence, and Condom Use Among Minority Urban Girls
J Interpers Violence, December 1, 2008; 23(12): 1694 - 1712.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Family IssuesHome page
S. L. Feld and R. B. Felson
Gender Norms and Retaliatory Violence Against Spouses and Acquaintances
Journal of Family Issues, May 1, 2008; 29(5): 692 - 703.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminist CriminologyHome page
R. M. Mann
Men's Rights and Feminist Advocacy in Canadian Domestic Violence Policy Arenas: Contexts, Dynamics, and Outcomes of Antifeminist Backlash
Feminist Criminology, January 1, 2008; 3(1): 44 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
I. Ruiz-Perez, J. Plazaola-Castano, and C. Vives-Cases
Methodological issues in the study of violence against women
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2007; 61(Suppl_2): ii26 - ii31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
C. M. Renzetti
Editor's Introduction
Violence Against Women, December 1, 2006; 12(12): 1103 - 1104.
[PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
S. L. Cook and L. A. Goodman
Beyond Frequency and Severity: Development and Validation of the Brief Coercion and Conflict Scales
Violence Against Women, November 1, 2006; 12(11): 1050 - 1072.
[Abstract] [PDF]