|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Conflict and Control
Gender Symmetry and Asymmetry in Domestic Violence
Michael P. Johnson
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Four types of individual partner violence are identified based on the dyadic control context of the violence. In intimate terrorism, the individual is violent and controlling, the partner is not. In violent resistance, the individual is violent but not controlling; the partner is the violent and controlling one. In situational couple violence, although the individual is violent, neither the individual nor the partner is violent and controlling. In mutual violent control, the individual and the partner are violent and controlling. Evidence is presented that situational couple violence dominates in general surveys, intimate terrorism and violent resistance dominate in agency samples, and this is the source of differences across studies with respect to the gender symmetry of partner violence. An argument is made that if we want to understand partner violence, intervene effectively in individual cases, or make useful policy recommendations, we must make these distinctions in our research.
Key Words: gender symmetry intimate terrorism mutual violent control situational couple violence violent resistance
Violence Against Women, Vol. 12, No. 11,
1003-1018 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077801206293328

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Allen, S. C. Swan, and C. Raghavan
Gender Symmetry, Sexism, and Intimate Partner Violence
J Interpers Violence,
November 1, 2009;
24(11):
1816 - 1834.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Paranjape, G. Corbie-Smith, N. Thompson, and N. J. Kaslow
When Older African American Women Are Affected by Violence in the Home: A Qualitative Investigation of Risk and Protective Factors
Violence Against Women,
August 1, 2009;
15(8):
977 - 990.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Tyler, L. A. Melander, and H. Noel
Bidirectional Partner Violence Among Homeless Young Adults: Risk Factors and Outcomes
J Interpers Violence,
June 1, 2009;
24(6):
1014 - 1035.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. B. Cunradi, M. Bersamin, and G. Ames
Agreement on Intimate Partner Violence Among a Sample of Blue-Collar Couples
J Interpers Violence,
April 1, 2009;
24(4):
551 - 568.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Menard, A. L. Anderson, and S. M. Godboldt
Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Recidivism: A 5-Year Follow-Up
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
January 1, 2009;
36(1):
61 - 76.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Teitelman, S. J. Ratcliffe, M. M. Morales-Aleman, and C. M. Sullivan
Sexual Relationship Power, Intimate Partner Violence, and Condom Use Among Minority Urban Girls
J Interpers Violence,
December 1, 2008;
23(12):
1694 - 1712.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Feld and R. B. Felson
Gender Norms and Retaliatory Violence Against Spouses and Acquaintances
Journal of Family Issues,
May 1, 2008;
29(5):
692 - 703.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Mann
Men's Rights and Feminist Advocacy in Canadian Domestic Violence Policy Arenas: Contexts, Dynamics, and Outcomes of Antifeminist Backlash
Feminist Criminology,
January 1, 2008;
3(1):
44 - 75.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Ruiz-Perez, J. Plazaola-Castano, and C. Vives-Cases
Methodological issues in the study of violence against women
J Epidemiol Community Health,
December 1, 2007;
61(Suppl_2):
ii26 - ii31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Renzetti
Editor's Introduction
Violence Against Women,
December 1, 2006;
12(12):
1103 - 1104.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Cook and L. A. Goodman
Beyond Frequency and Severity: Development and Validation of the Brief Coercion and Conflict Scales
Violence Against Women,
November 1, 2006;
12(11):
1050 - 1072.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|