Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Violence Against Women
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kingsnorth, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kingsnorth, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intimate Partner Violence

Predictors of Recidivism in a Sample of Arrestees

Rodney Kingsnorth

California State University, Sacramento

This article seeks to identify the variables that predict intimate partner violence recidivism. Neither prosecutorial actions, such as case rejection or subsequent dismissal, nor judicial imposition of jail terms or placement in a batterer treatment program demonstrated predictive value. Extralegal variables associated with the defendant, such as cohabitation status, marital status, gender, employment, and substance use at the time of the incident, all failed to attain significance. Victim support for arrest and prosecution were also unrelated to revictimization. Conversely, use of a weapon, the offender’s prior arrest for any offense, and the presence of a protective order at the time of the precipitating incident all predicted rearrest for intimate violence within an 18-month follow-up period. Policy implications are discussed.

Key Words: intimate partner violence • recidivism • revictimization

Violence Against Women, Vol. 12, No. 10, 917-935 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077801206293081
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Interpers ViolenceHome page
A. Kindness, H. Kim, S. Alder, A. Edwards, A. Parekh, and L. M. Olson
Court Compliance as a Predictor of Postadjudication Recidivism for Domestic Violence Offenders
J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1222 - 1238.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
J. H. Garner and C. D. Maxwell
Prosecution and Conviction Rates for Intimate Partner Violence
Criminal Justice Review, March 1, 2009; 34(1): 44 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. S. Menard, A. L. Anderson, and S. M. Godboldt
Gender Differences in Intimate Partner Recidivism: A 5-Year Follow-Up
Criminal Justice and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 36(1): 61 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]