Violence Against Women

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrill, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrill, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Violence Against Women, Vol. 11, No. 8, 1076-1107 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1077801205278046

Child Custody and Visitation Decisions When the Father Has Perpetrated Violence Against the Mother

Allison C. Morrill

Capacities and New England Research Institutes

Jianyu Dai

Capacities

Samantha Dunn

Iyue Sung

Kevin Smith

New England Research Institutes

This research evaluated the effectiveness of statutes mandating a presumption against custody to a perpetrator of domestic violence (DV) and judicial education about DV. Across six states, the authors examined 393 custody and/or visitation orders where the father perpetrated DV against the mother and surveyed 60 judges who entered those orders. With the presumption, more orders gave legal and physical custody to the mother and imposed a structured schedule and restrictive conditions on fathers’ visits, except where there was also a "friendly parent" provision and a presumption for joint custody. The presumption is effective only as part of a consistent statutory scheme. Although 86% of judges had received DV education, they scored no better in knowledge or attitudes. More of their orders gave mothers sole physical custody, and knowledge was associated with maternal custody, yet fewer structured or restricted fathers’ visitation. Quality of DV education is more important than statutory mandate.

Key Words: child custody • domestic violence • visitation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
M. D. Fields
Getting Beyond "What Did She Do to Provoke Him?": Comments by a Retired Judge on the Special Issue on Child Custody and Domestic Violence
Violence Against Women, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 93 - 99.
[PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
E. F. Rothman, D. G. Mandel, and J. G. Silverman
Abusers' Perceptions of the Effect of Their Intimate Partner Violence on Children
Violence Against Women, November 1, 2007; 13(11): 1179 - 1191.
[Abstract] [PDF]