Violence Against Women

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorenson, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sorenson, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shen, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Violence Against Women, Vol. 11, No. 7, 912-933 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1077801205276944
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Restraining Orders in California

A Look at Statewide Data

Susan B. Sorenson

University of California-Los Angeles

Haikang Shen

University of California-Los Angeles

The authors tabulated statewide administrative data for all types of restraining orders. On June 6, 2003, there were 227,941 active restraining orders against adults in California; most were for domestic violence. Rates of restraining orders (i.e., restrained persons) were highest for men, African Americans, and 25- to 34-year-olds. In 72.2% of the orders, a woman was to be protected and a man was to be restrained; in 19.3%, the restrained and protected persons were of the same sex. Although state law prohibits the purchase or possession of a firearm by persons against whom a restraining order is issued, 9.2% of the orders documented no firearm restrictions.

Key Words: domestic violence • firearms • restraining orders • women’s health


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Inj. Prev.Home page
K A Vittes and S B Sorenson
Restraining orders among victims of intimate partner homicide
Inj. Prev., June 1, 2008; 14(3): 191 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AffiliaHome page
J. L. Postmus
Challenging the Negative Assumptions Surrounding Civil Protection Orders: A Guide for Advocates
Affilia, November 1, 2007; 22(4): 347 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
P. L. Seave
Disarming batterers through restraining orders: the promise and the reality in california.
Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 245 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
K. A. Vittes and S. B. Sorenson
Are temporary restraining orders more likely to be issued when applications mention firearms?
Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 266 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
E. R. Vigdor and J. A. Mercy
Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide?
Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 313 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval RevHome page
S. Frattaroli and S. P. Teret
Understanding and informing policy implementation: a case study of the domestic violence provisions of the Maryland gun violence act.
Eval Rev, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 347 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]