This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1077801209346958v1 15/12/1477    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Libal, K. Articles by Parekh, S. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Libal, K. Articles by Parekh, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Reframing Violence Against Women as a Human Rights Violation: Evan Stark's Coercive Control

¹ University of Connecticut, West Hartford
² University of Connecticut, Storrs

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kathryn.libal{at}uconn.edu.

	Abstract

Evan Stark claims that partner-perpetrated physical abuse and other forms of violence against women ought to be understood as a human rights violation. The authors engage Stark’s rhetorically powerful political and analytical innovation by outlining one theoretical and one practical challenge to shifting the paradigm that researchers, advocates, and policy makers use to describe, explain, and remedy the harms of coercive control from misdemeanor assault to human rights violation. The theoretical challenge involves overcoming the public/private dichotomy that underpins liberal conceptions of human rights. The practical challenge involves using the human rights framework in the United States, given public indifference to human rights rhetoric or law, reluctance of U.S. policy makers to submit to scrutiny or justice-oriented processes under international law on issues of human rights and especially war crimes, and the consequent U.S. legacy of refusal to participate meaningfully in the international human rights process. The authors conclude that employing a human rights framework holds potential in the United States, but the paradigm shift Stark advocates will not materialize without widespread mobilization of interest in and understanding of human rights among domestic violence advocates and the society in general.

First published on October 15, 2009, doi:10.1177/1077801209346958

Violence Against Women 2009;15:1477.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?