This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brownridge, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brownridge, D. A. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Understanding Women’s Heightened Risk of Violence in Common-Law Unions

Revisiting the Selection and Relationship Hypotheses

University of Manitoba

Cohabiting women’s heightened risk of violence is a well-established relationship but one that is not fully understood. Using a recently collected representative sample of 7,396 Canadian women, the results of the present study show that the cohabitation-violence relationship persists. However, over a 6-year period, the prevalence of violence against women in cohabiting unions declined dramatically relative to marital unions. The results of the analyses suggest that the increasing prevalence of cohabitation has reduced the selection bias, in turn causing cohabitors’ and "marrieds"’ relationships to become increasingly similar. Nevertheless, the results also suggest that cohabitors remain a select group, and this differential selection is responsible for the persistence of their higher likelihood of violence. Overall, the results suggest that cohabitation will need to become much more prevalent before parity in rates of violence will be achieved between cohabitors and marrieds in Canada.

Key Words: cohabitation • risk of violence

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A. Brownridge The Elevated Risk for Violence Against Cohabiting Women: A Comparison of Three Nationally Representative Surveys of Canada Violence Against Women, July 1, 2008; 14(7): 809 - 832. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Perez Trujillo and S. Ross Police Response to Domestic Violence: Making Decisions About Risk and Risk Management J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2008; 23(4): 454 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. S. Catlett and J. E. Artis Critiquing the Case for Marriage Promotion: How the Promarriage Movement Misrepresents Domestic Violence Research Violence Against Women, November 1, 2004; 10(11): 1226 - 1244. [Abstract] [PDF]